Senator Jacob Howard Author of the 14th Amendment

Statement on Foreign Born

The very author of the citizenship clause, Sen. Jacob Howard of Michigan, expressly said: "This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers."

Intent of the Presidential Executive Order

There is an inordinate “thick-headedness” out there in La La Land about the proposed Executive Order [EO]. Of course the President cannot amend the Constitution with an EO. An EO only has the effect of law until overruled by a Court of Competent Jurisdiction or by legislation. In my opinion, only one such court has that, being equal to the Office of President, according to the Constitution—the Supreme Court of the United States [SCOTUS]. I do not believe ANY lower court has that authority—that is another misinterpretation of the meaning and intent of the Framers, dinked with over time by spurious case law. 
That is not the intent of the EO, a fact lost on lame duck Paul Ryan and FOX Moderator Martha McCallum, bless their l’il pea pickin’ hearts. The President has no need to amend because the language in the 14th Amendment, being argued, is being interpreted by the WH as providing the authority to nullify the Anchor Baby issue altogether. The bottom line of the EO is to kick it up to the Supreme Court of the United States by any means available. The EO is one such means.
The 14th Amendment is a “Johnny Come Lately” Amendment, ratified after the Civil War to address descendants of slaves and American Indians, as it turned out, not the illegal entry of foreign citizens. In other words, it was poorly crafted and it was not crafted by the original Framers.
The issue being argued right now is some very vague language, five words in fact: “any person within its jurisdiction”. This language is speaking to the individual States. This obscure language has been debated practically since the Amendment was Ratified. SCOTUS has never had a case in which they had to determine the meaning and intent of those 5 words. No matter whether this issue is kicked to SCOTUS by EO or legislation is academic—it can only be finally decided in the Supreme Court. The intent of the President is to issue the EO and begin the legal process for what needs to be done in any event. 
I simply do not understand why people are struggling with this. I would add too that I believe this to be a two pronged issue. There is nothing in the 14th Amendment that nullifies the supreme authority given to the President in Article II of the Constitution. As I stated, the 14th Amendment was written with respect to the individual states, most primarily aimed at the “slave states”. All things considered, the 14th Amendment is no longer pertinent but it is there so it has to be dealt with by SCOTUS, one way or the other.

Chelsea is WHAT???

I want my FB Friends to go get a glass of water. You may want to go to the medicine cabinet and retrieve an amyl nitrate and a baby aspirin. If you have access to O2, pull the cart over. Chelsea Clinton actually said she was prettier and better educated than Ivanka Trump. If you know ANYTHING about Ivanka’s Curricula Vitae and the schools she attended, you will know that Ivanka’s education is far superior. We won’t even get into the fact that Chelsea’s looks are a dead ringer for Webb Hubbell, a Chip off the Ole Block. I will not even post a pic of Chelsea, fearing my hard drive would crash.

What's a Ute?

OMG! So, Pocahantas took a DNA Test. I'm pretty sure too that she subscribes to the basic tenet, never ask a question for which you do not already know the answer. I am pretty sure that after this DNA Test is seasoned properly, we will learn that she is one half Chiricahua and the other half Ute. That princess ain't got a drop of Anglo-Saxon blood. I can tell by looking at her, with those high cheek bones and her forked tongue. BTW--what's a Ute?

Democrats Fighting for You LOL

Fighting for You
Another stratagem I have noticed lately coming from the Socialist Party is the incessant “fighting”. To a person, they are either fighting for this or fighting against that. Apparently, we are in for a mess of fighting. I was a Democrat from 1970 until September 26, 2018, and I have to say I have not seen one good fight yet. Hopefully, they have been practicing because it has been a non-starter yet. They have just released a new campaign Ad, depicting just a taste of their new direction…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4ZgVRJ-H8U&fbclid=IwAR0PjZgC8wx1_JGnuf4d9MdA-5qAlmwgIqJMZOGVdNmpwI3EM6s5B8Qn_Do

DNA Hints

DNA Hint #1: 10 generations ago, neither Pocahontas nor her forbears had traversed the Big Pond. My direct branch got here in 1718, my 5th G-Grandfather. His cousins got here in 1610, 4 generations previous to that. If she has American Indian Blood, it is clear that her forbears picked it up in the Old Country, not an impossible feat. It is also possible that her 10th G-Grandparents were dropped off at Martha’s Vineyard by Coronado for a little R&R for all the hard work they had done growing tobacco in the islands.
DNA Hint #2: Somebody’s lyin” :-)
Once again, it’s just a simple case of basic math, as are Autosomnal DNA calculations.

Supreme Court of the United States

If one is ever lucky and privileged enough to visit the hallowed chamber of the United States Supreme Court, it will affect you for all your days. Nothing compares but possibly the Oval Office. The power in both exude a palpable feeling that is impossible to articulate. If one is ever given the opportunity to witness arguments before the nine justices, it will render her/ him intimidated, knowing even the best and brightest are are rendered reverent, unequaled before man. If we do not already know your name, you are not one of those best and brightest. In designing the Supreme Court Building, architect Cass Gilbert utilized a classically inspired entrance procession to the Courtroom. The bronze doors, centered behind the massive columns of the front portico, signify the importance of the proceedings that occur within the Courtroom. The over-sized doors measure 17 feet high and 9 ½ feet wide, and weigh approximately 13 tons. Now that you know that, do you feel as silly as you look, scratching on those doors like sewer tats? If you were actually able to breach that entrance, you would know just how insignificant you really are. JS
U.S. Supreme Court of the United States