Friday, September 7, 2018

Stupid Is as Stupid Does


Response to the Nonsense from James Strauss
As he states himself on his own Facebook Page: “A man of no consequence...” LOL
Well, he began with STUPID. The Constitution was not going to be finally adopted until the 10 Amendments [Bill of Rights] were incorporated. The Bill of Rights is part and parcel an integral part of the United States Constitution, as adopted. If he was talking about the other 17 Amendments, that does speak to the "Living" thingy. To say the Constitution is constantly being changed is a bit of a stretch. The 27th and final Amendment was first introduced on September 15, 1789. Read that again...200 years ago. It was proposed by James Madison, the primary author of the Constitution.  On May 7, 1992, the Michigan House of Representatives approved it by a unanimous vote, giving the amendment the necessary three-fourths majority and ending the longest ratification process in U.S. history.
It was 6 years later when the 11th Amendment was ratified. Subsequent to the adoption of the Constitution, as stated previously, 17 Amendments have been ratified and the vast majority of those should be expunged from the record, in my opinion. Nonetheless, it has taken an average of 13 years for an Amendment to be ratified and as noted above, 26 years since the last one. I would strongly urge the 17th Amendment to be the first repealed, dropped on us like bird poop by Woodrow Wilson. The 13th-15th Amendments were proposed because Lincoln needed to brush up on the Constitution as adopted, rather than pandering and showboating. What can possibly be stated regarding the 16th Amendment other than to say it is more of a Woodrow Wilson “Turd in the Punch Bowl” thingy—instituting an open ended Federal Income Tax, without limits. More real foresight on his part *tongue in cheek* The 18th Amendment was of course repealed later by the 21st Amendment. It seems they wanted my grandparents to abstain from the “Demon Rum” but all it actually did was remove the ability to tax beverage alcohol and create our very own Cosa Nostra. Once again, we have the 19th Amendment because the hare-brained nitwits were unable to interpret the Constitution as written/ intended. The same can be stated for the 20th Amendment. Nothing really changed with respect to the 22nd Amendment, more housekeeping, due to the fact these nincompoops thought they were smarter than the Framers. This would also be true of the 24th through the 26th Amendments. Bozo and his clowns missed reading and interpretation in their 3rd Grade classes. It is best to just leave the Constitution alone but for my suggestion of repealing all its adoption. The 26th Amendment was the quickest to be Ratified, following its being proposed and the result shows it was about as well thought out as whether to crawl into the back seat with Becky—“Haste makes waste” and sometimes a large, bouncing baby with special needs :-)

Tuesday, September 4, 2018

Big Dog and Little Dog


In the last 3 years, Adidas stock is up 287%. That is massive! Nike stock over the same period is up 58%. That is a huge difference. I believe this is why Nike decided to do something radical to stop the bleeding. They decided to showcase the little dog in their marketing campaign, attempting to capture the 25-34 market, which is dumb because they have a large chunk of that already. They already have the big dog—the NFL; all NFL jerseys and other equipment are Nike. I think it can be said the NFL may be the Big Dog. The Big Dog however, lost TV revenue and advertising last year, the NFL ratings were down substantially, as were their stadium revenues as well non-stadium revenues of incidental sales. If that present trend continues this season and indications are that they will, both Nike and the NFL have a problem that may be systemic.
I think Nike has made an uneducated decision and has chosen the wrong market; they forgot the stock market—their investors. Today, Nike lost 3.16% of their stock value—that is large. It was the largest single loss in the DOW today. Their market capitalization is $127.4 Billion. In one day, their market capitalization dropped $4.02 Billion. In choosing the Big Dog and Little Dog, they forgot something very important, the Big Bull. Millennials buy shoes and shirts of course but they do not buy stock. That $4.2 Billion loss today was immediate and it was loud and clear. If you look at the demographics, Millennials do not buy season tickets, skyboxes, catered corporate clubs in stadiums, etc. Millennials work for those people. Millennials do not drive markets; they buy retail—the end markets owned by their elders, who spend the BIG BUCKS, the BULL. I guarantee you millennials did not buy $4.2 Billion of retail goods today. Ya think? J
Mess with the BULL, you get the horn.
p.s. Do yourself and the US a favor; donate your Nikes to the homeless and buy New Balance, 100% American Made.



Wednesday, August 1, 2018

Jefferson and Trump


In order to even begin to understand Jefferson and his contemporaries, most especially Madison, the penman of the Constitution, it is crucial to understand the time period in which it all occurred. Madison drew upon those he respected most in drafting the pieces of the Constitution which were ultimately debated and set to writing. I have read Madison’s Notes and they are available to anyone who might wish to learn what is behind each and every article and amendment.

Madison drew most especially upon the intellect of Thomas Jefferson. All of this is available too, in the letters they exchanged; largely because Jefferson was in Paris, as a diplomat, while the debate was ongoing. There are a number of books I refer to in order to understand the exchange between Jefferson and Madison. What Madison wrote was almost verbatim what Jefferson stated in their exchange of letters. One could accurately describe Jefferson as the ghost writer of what was adopted. One major exception was what Jefferson wrote with respect to the Separation of Church and State. Jefferson and Madison were not successful in getting that concept adopted in the 1st Amendment, but instead we got the Establishment Clause. Jefferson and Madison were however successful in getting the Separation Clause adopted in the Commonwealth of Virginia, where it remains in Code today. A number of the other colonies did the same in their respective Colonies.

Jefferson was a product of 3 overlapping times in history. The Renaissance is a period in European history, covering the span between the 14th and 17th centuries. It is an extension of the Middle Ages, and is bridged by the Age of Enlightenment to modern history. European politics, philosophy, science and communications were radically reoriented during the course of the “long 18th century” (1685-1815) as part of a movement referred to by its participants as the Age of Reason, or simply the Enlightenment. The Enlightenment was an intellectual and philosophical movement that dominated the world of ideas in Europe during the 18th century, "The Century of Philosophy". The Age of Reason; Being an Investigation of True and Fabulous Theology is a work by English and American political activist Thomas Paine, arguing for the philosophical position of Deism. Paine's original work was published in two parts in 1794 and 1795, titled Part First and Part II, and it sold very well in America. Part III was completed in the late 1790's, but Thomas Jefferson convinced Paine not to publish it in 1802, aware of the possible reprisals. Five years later Paine decided to publish despite the backlash he knew would ensue. It did not sell well.

This was the predominant “school of thought” of those enlightened sufficiently to comprehend it all. Jefferson most certainly was and added to that was the strong influence of his law professor and mentor, George Wythe. Dr. William Small, a professor at William and Mary, also held a large role of influence on Jefferson.

Jefferson’s Classical Education

As a member of the Gentry class, Thomas Jefferson received a good formal education. In his autobiography, Jefferson summarized his early education. He wrote that his father, Peter Jefferson, "... placed me at the English school at 5 years of age and at the Latin at 9, where I continued until his death." The Latin school was conducted by the Reverend William Douglas, of whom Jefferson wrote, "[he] was but a superficial Latinist, less instructed in Greek, but with the rudiments of these languages he taught me French.” Early in 1758, Jefferson began attending the school of Reverend James Maury, whom Jefferson credited as "a correct classical scholar." He continued studies with Reverend Maury for two years before entering the College of William and Mary in Williamsburg in the spring of 1760, at the age of seventeen.

Jefferson spent seven years in Williamsburg, first pursuing a course of study at William and Mary from March 1760 until April 1762, and then reading law with George Wythe. During his two years at William and Mary, he studied primarily under Dr. William Small, a tutelage that Jefferson described as, "my great good fortune, and what probably fixed the destinies of my life." Jefferson went on to say that, "He, most happily for me, became soon attached to me & made me his daily companion when not engaged in the school; and from his conversation I got my first views of the expansion of science & of the system of things in which we are placed." Before Small returned to Europe in 1762, he arranged for Jefferson to read law under the direction of George Wythe. Jefferson remained in Williamsburg under Wythe's guidance for the next five years and described this relationship in his Autobiography: "Mr. Wythe continued to be my faithful and beloved Mentor in youth, and my most affectionate friend through life. In 1767, he led me into the practice of the law at the bar of the General Court."
Jefferson's seven years of study at Williamsburg culminated in the practice of law but without any type of "degree" as might be granted today. In 1762, when Jefferson was completing his two-year course of study, William and Mary did grant degrees, but the course of study leading toward a degree took four to five years and was directed toward a career in the Anglican Church or as a professor. The gentry of Virginia followed the English model in seeking what would be considered a "gentleman's education." The emphasis was upon an appropriate education, not a degree.

Much later in his life, Jefferson would be concerned with the education of his grandson, Francis Wayles Eppes. In a letter to Francis's father, John Wayles Eppes, Jefferson expressed his opinion that the prescribed course of study that led to a degree would not be the wisest use of Francis's time and proposed that Francis should concentrate upon a course that would be of particular use to him: "This relinquishes the honorary distinction of a Diploma, a good enough thing to excite the ambition of youth to study, but, in modern estimation, no longer worth tacking, by its initials to one's name; and certainly not worth the sacrifice of a single useful science."

Jefferson himself could have "tacked initials" to his name had he felt it important, as he was awarded four honorary degrees during his lifetime.

Jefferson governed, as President of the United States, as he penned. He lived what he wrote, something seriously missing today with those who homestead elected offices in Washington, DC today, sadly. Noted below are the Principles of Jefferson and those principles are embodied in Jefferson's Platform for His Democrat-Republican Candidacy and Presidency.

As far as I am concerned, these remain the principles of my Democratic Party and no less so than I deem the Constitution to be interpreted as intended by the framers of said Constitution. If you come to understand this, you too will conclude that all Amendments passed after the 10th are superfluous, with rare exception.

Principles of Jefferson

About to enter, fellow citizens, on the exercise of duties which comprehend everything dear and valuable to you, it is proper that you should understand what I deem the essential principles of our government, and consequently those which ought to shape its administration. I will compress them within the narrowest compass they will bear, stating the general principle, but not all its limitations.
Equal and exact justice to all men, of whatever state or persuasion, religious or political;

peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations — entangling alliances with none;

the support of the State governments in all their rights, as the most competent administrations for our domestic concerns and the surest bulwarks against anti-republican tendencies;

the preservation of the general government in its whole constitutional vigor, as the sheet anchor of our peace at home and safety abroad;

a jealous care of the right of election by the people — a mild and safe corrective of abuses which are lopped by the sword of the revolution where peaceable remedies are unprovided;

absolute acquiescence in the decisions of the majority — the vital principle of republics, from which there is no appeal but to force, the vital principle and immediate parent of despotism;

a well-disciplined militia — our best reliance in peace and for the first moments of war, till regulars may relieve them;

Principles of Jefferson: the militia is EVERY able-bodied man between the ages of 18-55. [He provided NO exceptions!]

the supremacy of the civil over the military authority;

economy in the public expense, that labor may be lightly burdened; the honest payment of our debts and sacred preservation of the public faith;

encouragement of agriculture, and of commerce as its handmaid;

the diffusion of information and the arraignment of all abuses at the bar of public reason;

freedom of religion; [NOT freedom from religion]
freedom of the press;

freedom of person under the protection of the habeas corpus; and trial by juries impartially selected — these principles form the bright constellation which has gone before us, and guided our steps through an age of revolution and reformation.

Jefferson promised to govern as he felt the Founders intended, based on decentralized government & trust in the people to make the right decisions for themselves. He favored a more literal interpretation of the Constitution and thought that [Federal] governmental powers shouldn’t be so far-reaching. These are the Principles of Jefferson.

Jefferson strictly interpreted the Constitution and believed in a decentralized government that should exist primarily to protect man’s natural rights to life, liberty, and property. Jefferson felt that the states should hold greater authority than the federal government, since the states were closer to the people and were less likely to abuse their authority. Furthermore, his strict interpretation of the Constitution—believing that what was not specifically written was forbidden.

Jefferson's Platform for His Democrat-Republican Candidacy and Presidency

Political parties in the 1790s did not issue official platforms, but our co-founder Thomas Jefferson issued a major statement in January 1799 that was widely reprinted and circulated. It became the basis of his party's philosophy and is the basis of the platform of the Jefferson Democrat-Republican Party [Present day Democrat Party] today:

…In confutation of these and all future calumnies, by way of anticipation, I shall make to you a profession of my political faith; in confidence that you will consider every future imputation on me of a contrary complexion, as bearing on its front the mark of falsehood and calumny.

I do then, with sincere zeal, wish an inviolable preservation of our present federal constitution, according to the true sense in which it was adopted by the States, that in which it was advocated by its friends, and not that which its enemies apprehended, who therefore became its enemies; and I am opposed to the monarchising its features by the forms of its administration, with a view to conciliate a first transition to a President and Senate for life, and from that to a hereditary tenure of these offices, and thus to worm out the elective principle. I am for preserving to the States the powers not yielded by them to the Union and to the legislature of the Union its constitutional share in the division of powers.

And I am not for transferring all the powers of the States to the general government, nor all those of that government to the Executive branch. I am for a government rigorously frugal and simple, applying all the possible savings of the public revenue to the discharge of the national debt; and not for a multiplication of officers and salaries merely to make partisans, and for increasing, by every device, the public debt, on the principle of it's being a public blessing.

I am for relying, for internal defence, on our militia solely, till actual invasion, and for such a naval force only as may protect our coasts and harbors from such depredations as we have experienced; and not for a standing army in time of peace, which may overawe the public sentiment; nor for a navy, which, by its own expenses and the eternal wars in which it will implicate us, grind us with public burthens, and sink us under them. I am for free commerce with all nations, political connection with none, and little or no diplomatic establishment.

And I am not for linking ourselves by new treaties with the quarrels of Europe; entering that field of slaughter to preserve their balance, or joining in the confederacy of kings to war against the principles of liberty. I am for freedom of religion, and against all maneuvers to bring about a legal ascendancy of one sect over another: for freedom of the press, and against all violations of the constitution to silence by force and not by reason the complaints or criticisms, just or unjust, of our citizens against the conduct of their agents.

And I am for encouraging the progress of science in all its branches and not for raising a hue and cry against the sacred name of philosophy. For awing the human mind by stories of raw-head & bloody bones to a distrust of its own vision, & to repose implicitly on that of others, to go backwards instead of forwards to look for improvement, to believe that government, religion, morality, and every other science were in the highest perfection in ages of the darkest ignorance, and that nothing can ever be devised more perfect than what was established by our forefathers.

To these I will add, that I was a sincere well-wisher to the success of the French revolution, and still wish it may end in the establishment of a free and well-ordered republic. But I have not been insensible under the atrocious depredations they have committed on our commerce.

-Thomas Jefferson

I truly and sincerely believe that the sitting President is trying his heart out to take us back to these Principles. The enlightenment and intellect of today is no match for those who sat through this process of Adoption and Ratification. These were far superior men, with a far superior intellect and a far superior honesty, integrity and character. We do not have to equal that intellect to know what to do to get it right. We just have to know to look back to them and their understanding to do what is right.

By the way, there is no room in the Party of Jefferson for Socialists or “Social Democrats”, as they self-identify. Jefferson’s Party Platform remains the framework of my party, Jefferson’s Democrat-Republican Party. If anyone reading this believes he/ she is up to the intellect and all else of Jefferson and his fellow Framers, disabuse yourself of that nonsense, you are suffering delusions of grandeur. We do not live in the Age of Reason, Enlightenment or Renaissance. We now live in the Age of Self, with no regard for reason, or of our fellow man. Furthermore, you will not understand even a minuscule part of why I write what I write from time to time until you read this. These are the things I believe and I write what I believe to be true.

Footnote:  George Wythe was a signer of the Declaration of Independence.

Wednesday, April 25, 2018

The Real What For of Trump's Case at the US Supreme Court - They Do NOT Belong Here


TJ and the Berbers

The crux of the manner, then and now:

In March 1786, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams went to London to negotiate with Tripoli's envoy, ambassador Sidi Haji Abdrahaman (or Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja). When they enquired "concerning the ground of the pretensions to make war upon nations who had done them no injury", the ambassador replied:
"It was written in their Koran, that all nations which had not acknowledged the Prophet were sinners, whom it was the right and duty of the faithful to plunder and enslave; and that every Musselman who was slain in this warfare was sure to go to paradise. He said, also, that the man who was the first to board a vessel had one slave over and above his share, and that when they sprang to the deck of an enemy's ship, every sailor held a dagger in each hand and a third in his mouth; which usually struck such terror into the foe that they cried out for quarter at once."

That was the last straw from Jefferson. Note this:  The Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom was drafted in 1777 (however it was not first introduced into the Virginia General Assembly until 1779) by Thomas Jefferson in the city of Fredericksburg, Virginia. On January 16, 1786, the Assembly enacted the statute into the state's law.

This was what truly the the Separation of Church and State law which later failed during the Ratification and was compromised down to what we have today—the Establishment Clause. If you know anything about Jefferson, you would know that quote would put him over the top. If you have seen his writings, you would know that he considered Islam and Islamists beneath whale poop. He was under no illusion that we were not at war with Islam. We have been for our entire history and we are still now. To think otherwise is both naïve and delusional.

The First Barbary War (1801–1805), also known as the Tripolitanian War and the Barbary Coast War, was the first of two Barbary Wars, in which the United States and Sweden fought against the four North African states known collectively as the "Barbary States"—all Islamic Caliphates. Three of these were nominal provinces of the Ottoman Empire, but in practice autonomous: TripoliAlgiers, and Tunis. The fourth was the independent Sultanate of Morocco.

Just before Jefferson's inauguration in 1801, Congress passed naval legislation that, among other things, provided for six frigates that "'shall be officered and manned as the President of the United States may direct.' ... In the event of a declaration of war on the United States by the Barbary powers, these ships were to 'protect our commerce and chastise their insolence—by sinking, burning or destroying their ships and vessels wherever you shall find them.

On 10 May 1801, the Pasha declared war on the U.S., not through any formal written documents but in the customary Barbary manner of cutting down the flagstaff in front of the U.S. Consulate. Algiers and Tunis did not follow their ally in Tripoli. Based upon the legislation passed by Congress, we were at War, prima facie. Period.

In 1812, the new Dey of Algiers, Hajji Ali, rejected the American tribute negotiated in the 1795 treaty as insufficient and declared war on the United States. AGAIN! We were at War!
Once the Treaty of Ghent ended war with Britain, President James Madison requested that Congress declare war on Algiers, with Congress authorizing the use of force on March 3, 1815. The U.S. Navy, greatly increased in size after the War of 1812, was able send an entire squadron, led by Commodore Stephen Decatur, to the Mediterranean. Once again, a Declaration of War!

“Google” this and you will learn that Snopes, the “research” arm of Soros, will try to convince you it never happened; that there was never a Declaration of War and that we certainly were not at war with Islam. What do you think Jefferson would say? These idiots at Snopes couldn’t research an outhouse! To hear Snopes tell it, you would believe the Musselmen built this country. These idiots can’t even pitch a tent properly.

Know this—you can never negotiate with Islam. There is only one thing they understand. When they take up their scimitars, annihilate them and that is your only option. A treaty with such caliphates is toilet paper. Know and understand their favorite for the infidels—Taqiyya. No treaty ended the Barbary Wars. Guess what did? Their complete utter defeat and taking control of them, as follows:

Admiral Duperré took command in Toulon of an armada of 600 ships and then headed for Algiers. Following a plan for the invasion of Algeria originally developed under Napoleon in 1808, General de Bourmont then landed 34,000 soldiers 27 kilometres (17 mi) west of Algiers, at Sidi Ferruch, on 14 June 1830. To face the French, the dey sent 7,000 janissaries, 19,000 troops from the Beys of Constantine and Oran, and about 17,000 Kabyles. The French established a strong beachhead and pushed toward Algiers, thanks in part to superior artillery and better organization. On 19 June the French defeated the dey's army at the battle of Staouéli, and entered Algiers on 5 July after a three-week campaign. The dey accepted capitulation in exchange for his freedom and the offer to retain possession of his personal wealth. Five days later, he went into exile in Naples with his family. The Turkish Janissaries also quit the territory, leaving for Turkey. The Dey's departure ended 313 years of Ottoman rule of the territory. It also made Algeria in full control of the French. The French were not colonists in this case but they sure as hell were the conquistadores.

Know this too—Trump too is an adherent to the Principles of Jefferson and that is at the crux of his case now before the Supreme Court. He, along with Jefferson and I, believe they have no business here but making trouble. He too knows the very simple understanding; you cannot make treaties, they lie like dogs [Taqiyya], you have to kill them. Welcome to the real world.

Jefferson was right, once again, then and now.

Friday, April 20, 2018

Medical Bankruptcy


One of the latest “Resist” movement indoctrination papers being touted by the George Soros/ Saul Alinsky Resist Party has to do with “Medical Bankruptcy”. Bless their little misguide hearts. This is what they learn in their Liberal Arts “education” on just about any campus in the USA. They like to refer to themselves as Democrats, largely due to the fact no one else will have them. None of them has a clue of Thomas Jefferson and his original Democrat-Republican Party Platform [See Below]. Yes Alice, it is in black and white.
Most of these children want to be just like “Socialist” Europe, none having ever stepped foot in Europe. There is not one Socialist State in Europe, mostly Social Democrat states. There remains only four Socialist States and none are in Europe. Those that were for even a short stint, are no longer extant, having realized it is a failed system but for their benevolent dictators, family and friends. Preceding their Liberal Arts foray in colleges and universities, most were warehoused in kindercare; a perfect beginning into the realm of communal living, largely without parental instruction. Their parent had other things to do, thus leaving little time for the drudgery of parenting.
They largely have the view that the system is the evil which befell them and it did but not realizing what system it was that actually did the damage. They blame everyone/ everything for their station in life without any sense of introspection, being wholly incapable of that. This phenomenon is largely due to that stellar “parenting”. They can give you a lengthy list of all the problems but having no conceptualization of a singular solution. So, what is their answer to everything? RESIST. RESIST everything and everyone—they typically blame it all on the Boomers—their grandparents. I know I blamed everything on my grandparents as I was growing up LMAO!
You will see that my background has been in management. One of my favorite exercises had to do with problem solving. When an employee came to me with a problem, I thanked them for that and then asked if they had a possible solution[s] to that problem—the audacity! It did not take long before they got the idea that their “suggestion” would require them to think before speaking. The “suggestion box” was a lot less cluttered. As an aside however, a few who had the ability of constructive thinking actually came up with some good possible solutions to some very real problems. Try that today and note the “deer in the headlights” countenance. It could cause some to eat laundry detergent or snort a condom.
I recently saw a screenshot having to do with “medical bankruptcies” on my timeline, touted by the Young Democrats of Pottawatomie County. Please note their background photo with the term, RESIST, in large font. This would be Pottawatomie County, Oklahoma, not Cuba: https://www.facebook.com/youngdemsofpottcounty/
They assert 643,000 recent medical bankruptcies in the USA with all other countries in the world and a few planets having exactly “Zero”. There’s that liberal arts thingy rearing its ugly head again. They are pretty sure the rest of us, especially the Boomers, are just Neanderthal, having the class of a bull moose in a china closet, whilst Tide Pod spittle trickles from the corners of their respective mouths and a condom “dangleth” from thine nostril. Let me just add this; there’s not a Democrat in the lot and they are a good deal of the reason we, the Democratic Party in Oklahoma, can’t get the city dog pound officer elected. The Democratic Party long since passed, punted the ball, having not a sellable issue in the lot. We handed the keys to the Corvair to the GOP and all we have to offer now is to RESIST. Hell’s Bells, a four year old can do that!
I captured the following [Below] from a practicing bankruptcy attorney by the name of Sean Mays. You will find the same story about the 643,000 poor souls, disrupted by “medical bankruptcy”, in stories related by CNBC, Huffington Post, USA Today, Snopes of course, the Motley Fool, Yahoo, Pocahontas, Schumer, Pelosi, DNC, et al press offices of George Soros. It is Saul Alinsky 101 and I am sure they think we are so dense we can’t possibly know that. Watch as their eyes roll back into their little heads like a slot machine at the local casino while they peruse this—free entertainment:
Your question is difficult to answer because “medical bankruptcy” is more of a political term, not a legal one. You will not find “medical bankruptcy” in the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, and what constitutes a “medical bankruptcy” is debatable.
I practice bankruptcy law in the United States, and yes, I do have clients with medical debt. The overwhelming majority of these clients have medical insurance, and the medical bills are for amounts that are not covered by their plan. Anecdotally, I can say that none of my clients have ever complained of medical bills as their chief reason for wanting to file bankruptcy. Stopping a foreclosure, repossession or garnishment are the most common reasons. I have had, however, clients complaining of missed income due to medical conditions or disability, and stating that this loss of income was a contributing factor. These clients would fit the definition of “medical bankruptcy”, at least as that term is defined by Elizabeth Warren. Editorial Note:  This would be Pocahontas for the unwashed—a “Minority Member” from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts :-)
If, for the purposes of your question, we are defining “medical bankruptcy” in the same manner as Elizabeth Warren’s research, then I would respectfully disagree with the other contributors who posit that medical bankruptcy does not occur outside of the United States. As others have pointed out, most other countries have a form of universal or single payer healthcare. But, this does not mean that citizens in those countries do not have medical debt or that their citizens would have no need to file a “medical bankruptcy”. Canada, for example, has universal health insurance which is paid primarily through their tax system. Not all medical costs are covered, however. For example, one survey of Canadian debtors published in 2014, found that prior to bankruptcy, two-thirds of the respondents reported bills for prescriptions drugs greater than $5,000.00 CA. Canadians also experience lost income due to missed work, which would also be considered a “medical bankruptcy”.
The United Kingdom’s National Health Service also provides free health care, but that doesn’t mean there is no “medical bankruptcy” in the UK. It is still possible to opt-out of the NHS coverage and obtain private coverage in order to obtain faster treatment or medical treatments that are not covered by the NHS (although this is infrequent). It is also just as possible to lose income due in the UK due to a medical condition. In fact, reports published by their Insolvency Service do list “illness” as primary and secondary causes of bankruptcy in a percentage of cases. These would qualify as a “medical bankruptcy” under the definition crafted by Sen. Warren.  Editor’s Note:  That would actually be George Soros.
Another thing to consider is that it would be an apples-to-oranges comparison. Health care in other countries is paid mostly through their tax systems. So could you consider unpaid tax bills as “medically related”? Also, the bankruptcy laws and processes can be drastically different between countries. Many consider the consumer bankruptcy laws in the United States to be favorable to the debtor. For example, in the United States it is actually possible to keep large amounts of assets and still receive a discharge of your debts. A family filing for a “medical bankruptcy” in the United States could still keep tens of thousands of dollars in equity in their home and other personal property, along with their complete retirement savings and certain other assets. These are results that cannot be obtained in many other countries. Personally, I have assisted debtors in discharging all of their unsecured debt while being able to keep approximately $90,000.00 in equity in a home (this is not typical, but was possible due to the specifics circumstances of the case).
Bankruptcy is only one of many solutions to a financial problem. The problem you truly seem to be asking about is the financial impact of illness and disability. It is my own opinion that using the number of bankruptcy filings as a sort of proxy to compare these financial impacts in various countries is not going to give you accurate results.
Just for the Shites and Giggles, I am providing the original Democratic Party Platform in the Comments [Below]. Let’s see who might be the DUMBA$$E$; the Boomers or the present day little children of God—will they comprehend a word of it? If anyone reading this might presume I am being a bit hard on our little snowflakes, peruse their website. It is chock full of Horseshite on their vast knowledge of the Boomer Generation and just about everything else they post. As with this and all else I post, it meets my Three Rules of Social Media Posting: Is it fair? Is it accurate? Does it have maybe just a wee bit ‘o spun humor? Political Correctness is not one of my rules—it is reserved for amateurs. Happy days are here again.

Wednesday, April 11, 2018

Take the 6th Amendment Mr. President

Amendment VI

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

Sunday, March 25, 2018

Supremacy HELL!


If you would like to have just a slice of understanding of the Constitution, how it is to be viewed, understood, interpreted and applied today, DVR the Levin show on FOX; his interview with Senator Mike Lee R-UT. He is one of a handful remaining of bona fide Constitutional Scholars.
Elected in 2010 as Utah's 16th Senator, Mike Lee has spent his career defending the basic liberties of Americans and “Utahns” as a tireless advocate for our founding constitutional principles.
Senator Lee acquired a deep respect for the Constitution early on. His father, Rex Lee, who served as the Solicitor General under President Ronald Reagan, would often discuss varied aspects of judicial and constitutional doctrine around the kitchen table, from Due Process to the uses of Executive Plenary Power. He attended most of his father's arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court, giving him a unique, hands-on experience and understanding of government up close.
Lee graduated from Brigham Young University with a Bachelor of Science in Political Science, and served as BYU's Student Body President in his senior year. He graduated from BYU's Law School in 1997 and went on to serve as law clerk to Judge Dee Benson of the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah, and then with future Supreme Court Justice Judge Samuel A. Alito, Jr. on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
He gets it! If you want case law, go to Harvard. If you want the Constitution, go just about anywhere else. A word of advice; the “Supremacy Clause” is supreme only with respect to the federal powers as set out in Art 1 Sect 8, all else is left to the States and to the People. Another word of caution to those of you who have no understanding of elections by States but hope for a simple democracy: Keep in mind; Lincoln won with the Constitutionally provided electoral process. Lincoln only garnered less than 40% of the popular vote but won the Electoral College. Think for a moment; what if Stephen Douglas had won and the first GOP candidate had lost.
Are you or I smarter than those of the Age of Enlightenment who put this all together? I do not even have to wonder—their minds, their character, their commitment to binding this Republic to the Creator cannot be matched today. Very few today can even compute that. Mike Lee comes to the table with honesty and integrity. He is from the Libertarian [Jeffersonian] wing of the GOP.
Do yourself a favor and DVR this interview, one full hour of a real, true Constitutionalist, as it was intended. If we can only rescind the 17th Amendment, we can again, have the Republic, as intended, and not until.