Friday, September 24, 2010
"In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: [cont.]
you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself." Federalist 51, James Madison [Protege' of T. Jefferson]
Thursday, September 23, 2010
Our illustrious "president" just said, "let me be clear once more". Does that mean he will no longer be [cont.]
clear? Let's hope so--every time he's clear, we take another step toward the precipice.
Wednesday, September 22, 2010
Obama is making Carter look messiah-like in comparison. About what I thought he would look like now even [cont.]
during the primaries. I must be prescient.
I am hearing some, even Obamanots, saying now that this Administration if fast becoming out of control. [cont.]
I would say, you missed it by about 21 months. They have never been in control but were delusional sufficiently they actually thought they were.
Obama has decided it prudent to try to change the formula [health care] of our 400 y/a experiment & more [cont.]
recently the formula of the experiment of the wisest men in world history. He thinks he is wiser than they. That is his arrogance. Note to Obama: You aren't worthy of shining their shoes.
Monday, September 20, 2010
"As an American I'm not so shocked that Obama was given the Nobel Peace Prize without any accomplishments [cont.]
to his name, because America gave him the White House based on the same credentials." Newt Gingrich
Friday, September 17, 2010
Thursday, September 16, 2010
Wednesday, September 15, 2010
Mexico joining in the Arizona lawsuit is a direct violation to the 11th Amendment. The only reason we [cont.]
needed it is due to the diminutive intellect of the courts to comprehend the Constitution already in place.
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Friday, September 10, 2010
From Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution, we find these words: No State shall, without the [cont.]
Consent of Congress, engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay." In other words, Arizona clearly has the Constitutional Authority to "engage".
"Article III, Sec. 2, clause 2 says: "In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and [cont.]
Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the Supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction." In other words the court in Arizona that heard the case and the appellate court in San Francisco have NO jurisdiction. Too bad they don't teach Constitutional Law anymore in law schools.
Thursday, September 9, 2010
Dumbama wants to tax the "rich". They don't pay taxes. They have former IRS agents who are now tax [cont.]
attorneys who know the loopholes. Get real you CRETIN! Didn't learn that as a community organizer did ya?
Wednesday, September 8, 2010
Monday, September 6, 2010
Saturday, September 4, 2010
Friday, September 3, 2010
Since Obama, Harry & Nancy [Larry, Curly & Ho] are so enamored with a "consumer economy", why would they [cont.]
repeal the Bush Tax Cut on the "rich", who comprise 40% of all consumption. By the way, there is NO such thing as a consumer economy. Delusional!
